FCA Mills Review
Recommends a trusted framework for how AI agents are authorised, identified and held accountable.
Source ↗WHY NOW
Dated regulatory and market signals show why organisations in every regulated sector need AI trust infrastructure now.
Recommends a trusted framework for how AI agents are authorised, identified and held accountable.
Source ↗Places generative and agentic AI outside model-risk guidance; banks remain responsible for governing them.
Source ↗Gartner analysis cited by Opsin says internal policy violations are expected to drive a large share of unauthorised AI-agent transactions.
Source ↗Qatar’s Ministry of Communications and Information Technology published a draft National AI Policy for consultation, extending the national AI conversation beyond a single sector.
Source ↗Gartner predicts over 40% of agentic AI projects will be cancelled by end-2027, citing inadequate risk controls among the causes.
Source ↗Requires an annual AI register and approval gates for high-risk AI, creating the first binding Qatar control need QVATRICS is targeting.
QCB guideline summary ↗National strategy context ↗Guidance addresses AI development, deployment and use across sectors, broadening the trust and governance requirement beyond financial services.
Source ↗Qatar’s National Cyber Security Agency launched guidance for secure adoption and use of AI across organisations.
Source ↗Law No. 13 of 2016 creates cross-sector obligations for organisations processing personal data, including AI-enabled processing.
Law text ↗THE COMMON QUESTION
Posture, identity, policy and evidence are often managed separately. Payments, production changes and data exports cross all four at once.
QVATRICS ONE connects them into one authority and evidence path before execution.
Run the live demoTHE NEXT CONVERSATION
Start with one workflow. Define its authority, test its boundaries and make every decision explainable.
Discuss a pilotRun the live demo